ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-MD72-HB2-00

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MD72-HB2-00 (all builds)
Memory	114.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221121
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '23 at 11:46
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4310 25 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	50% Above average	Memory 52.6 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 135 49% 86.6 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 574 48% 414 Pts	64-Core 2,460 152% 2,460 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX A5000 809 User benchmarks, average bench 166% Nvidia(10DE 147E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 104 Reflection 182 Parallax 248 85% 178 fps	MRender 305 Gravity 185 Splatting 185 179% 225 fps
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 172%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108 327,441 User benchmarks, average bench 385% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2819 1993 1799 1798 1838 1862 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	300% Outstanding	Read 1,534 Write 1,688 Mixed 1,673 SusWrite 2,018 391% 1,728 MB/s	4K Read 59.9 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 96.6 275% 90.4 MB/s	DQ Read 679 DQ Write 553 DQ Mixed 708 505% 647 MB/s
Poor: 266% ↑ This bench: 300% Great: 477%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP4000GM30013 4TB 1,085 User benchmarks, average bench 482% 2TB free Firmware: SU6SM003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3592 2477 1953 3677 2887 2637 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	341% Outstanding	Read 1,362 Write 2,211 Mixed 1,771 SusWrite 2,870 468% 2,054 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 96.3 248% 91.2 MB/s	DQ Read 747 DQ Write 642 DQ Mixed 753 548% 714 MB/s
Poor: 246% ↑ This bench: 341% Great: 634%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB 4,692 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 121GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 371 366 369 376 377 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 298 Write 260 Mixed 216 SusWrite 372 65% 286 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 16.4 65% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 124 99% 139 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 83%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 2TB 1,066 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 519GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 386 384 387 385 390 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 289 Write 317 Mixed 246 SusWrite 387 70% 310 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 13.7 45% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 167 124% 164 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 88%
Seagate ST10000NM0016-1T 10TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 227 226 226 230 227 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9ASF2G72PZ-3G2B1 8x16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 142% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	123% Outstanding	MC Read 63.6 MC Write 41.8 MC Mixed 46.1 144% 50.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 10.5 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 151 26% 151 ns
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 184%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-MD72-HB2-00 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 144%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MD72-HB2-00

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 43101stBench 60%, 25 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 63341stBench 74%, 12 samples	2x

GPU
RTX A5000NvidiaBench 166%, 809 samples	5x

SSD
FireCuda 530 ZP4000GM30013 4TBSeagateBench 482%, 1,085 samples	3x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $108Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	2x

RAM
9ASF2G72PZ-3G2B1 8x16GBMicronBench 142%, 7 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback