Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory53.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 17:06
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 95.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 258
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 797
74% 617 Pts
64-Core 973
60% 973 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
MSI(1462 371E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4475 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Lighting 245
Reflection 221
Parallax 288
200% 251 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 242
Splatting 172
190% 242 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 177%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$300
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 700 664 687 642 674 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 2,264
Write 1,129
Mixed 1,034
SusWrite 708
284% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 40.2
132% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 611
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 211
192% 308 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 191%
Great: 425%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
85GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 390 388 424 415 432 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 445
Write 397
Mixed 344
SusWrite 406
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 36.3
117% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 98.9
DQ Mixed 203
158% 225 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 129 130 144 137 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 99.4
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 132
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
185% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 158 148 161 151 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 90.9
Write 122
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 156
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3866 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 35.7
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 47.3
SC Mixed 31.7
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 114%
Great: 197%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $1,147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback