HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 13:10
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 347
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.1
3% 4 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Casper-128GB 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 56 60 56 60 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 460
Write 105
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 61.4
39% 179 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 7.8
89% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 91.2
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 25.3
29% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 77%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB
381GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 129 133 132 132 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 140
Write 138
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 132
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB
914GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 183 182 186 184 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 120
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 184
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
478GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 82 81 82 87 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 55.9
Write 80.1
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 79.3
55% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
192% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
851GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 99 107 107 108 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 69.4
Write 111
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 105
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
204% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
938GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 91 97 86 88 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 51
Write 74
Mixed 80
SusWrite 92.9
56% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
233% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 15.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 94
42% 94 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback