Compulab Intense-PC2 (IPC2)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompulab Intense-PC2 (IPC2)  (all builds)
MotherboardCompuLab Intense-PC2 (IPC2)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 20:31
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
CPU Socket - Soldered BGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 125
52% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 165
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2010) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 5.9
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM08L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 192 207 201 211 213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 239
Write 227
Mixed 184
SusWrite 200
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 17.4
68% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 52.2
DQ Mixed 23.2
34% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP004GLSTU160N02 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intense-PC2 (IPC2) Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Compulab Intense-PC2 (IPC2)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback