Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 17:24
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 94
2-Core 190
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 530
55% 442 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2680) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.30
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.6% Below average
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 47.2
29% 39.4 fps
MRender 47.7
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 36.5
34% 42.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 219 219 232 233 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.5% Good
Read 244
Write 190
Mixed 184
SusWrite 224
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 26.4
96% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 179
138% 187 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 134%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
838GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 98 95 99 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 94.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 96.5
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
402GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 71 70 71 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 72.3
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 70
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 103 104 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 110
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 103
73% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
198GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 62 62 64 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 78.6
Write 86.1
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 62.4
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2133 C11 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 34.7
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,060
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback