Today's hottest deals

Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1536 x 864 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 31 '23 at 08:11
Run Duration53 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6226
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
Memory 9.27
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 136
34% 71.1 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 433
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 54GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 67.7
Mixed 92.6
67% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.6
292% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 18.3
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 4.6
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 410
10% 410 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback