Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2800 x 1752 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMar 30 '23 at 17:50
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 208
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 592
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
PNY(196E 1347) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69% Good
Lighting 85.6
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 78.3
70% 82.9 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 77.5
Splatting 69.4
68% 84.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 340 285 340 275 281 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 467
Mixed 417
SusWrite 324
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 33.1
114% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 368
276% 368 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 84 86 85 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 88.8
Write 87.5
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 84.6
64% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
929GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 68 69 69 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 115
Write 117
Mixed 62
SusWrite 68.7
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 68%
ST6000NM 0044 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 92 95 92 92 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.9% Good
Read 203
Write 190
Mixed 114
SusWrite 91.8
193% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.3
206% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 63%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
626GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.8% Very poor
Read 78.8
Write 82.6
Mixed 68
SusWrite 0.8
74% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
272GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.6% Very poor
Read 80.6
Write 83.5
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 0.7
77% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 91 95 92 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.5% Below average
Read 89
Write 90.8
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 90.9
121% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 28.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 24.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $381WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback