Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83E1
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 14:25
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$152
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 81.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 261
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 846
84% 684 Pts
64-Core 996
62% 996 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 83E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.73 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.7
8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDEL1TB 1TB
864GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0818A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 358 388 387 359 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 482
Write 366
Mixed 392
SusWrite 312
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 25.1
102% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 46.1
83% 158 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC M378A5143EB1-CPB M378A5244CB0-CRC M391A5143EB1-CPB 16GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.5% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 19.4
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21.5
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback