Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83E1
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '23 at 16:54
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$152
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 51.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
71% 136 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 712
72% 583 Pts
64-Core 825
51% 825 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 83E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.71% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 8.2
5% 7.73 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.71%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDEL1TB 1TB
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0818A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 401 396 354 358 364 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 420
Write 329
Mixed 343
SusWrite 379
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 21
85% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 48.3
80% 150 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC M378A5143EB1-CPB M378A5244CB0-CRC M391A5143EB1-CPB 16GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 8.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 39%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback