HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProLiant ML350p Gen8  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory248.6 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 04:16
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 48.3
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 183
58% 108 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 658
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 1,882
116% 1,882 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 6.6
6% 7.57 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 7.1
6% 8.13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$95
767GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 202 203 200 199 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.8% Above average
Read 215
Write 204
Mixed 203
SusWrite 201
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 32.5
103% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 80.8
DQ Mixed 47.6
39% 54 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 126%
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 620311WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1977 1949 1948 1899 1882 1882 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,470
Write 1,987
Mixed 2,011
SusWrite 1,923
471% 2,098 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 64.8
217% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 655
DQ Write 524
DQ Mixed 590
441% 589 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 310%
Great: 666%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
91GB free
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1219 289 291 290 289 288 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 2,168
Write 1,540
Mixed 1,321
SusWrite 444
304% 1,368 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 55.5
180% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 515
370% 481 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 191%
Great: 235%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
22GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 58 57 57 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 56.4
Write 43.9
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 56.8
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 67%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 2TB
196GB free
Firmware: 8.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 49 48 48 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 98%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 10TB
6TB free
Firmware: 8.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 51 51 50 51 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2TB free, PID ab38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 155 155 153 153 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 82.8
Write 103
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 152
142% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
203% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 712384-081 712384-081 712384-081 712384-081 712384-081 712384-081 NOT AVAILABLE 712384-081 255GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 48.4
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 37.3
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.4
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML350p Gen8 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 223% - Outstanding Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback