Today's hottest deals

Medion MD35147

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD35147  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B460H6-EM
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 15:57
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 718
71% 579 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.4% Very good
Lighting 94.8
Reflection 153
Parallax 106
77% 118 fps
MRender 91.5
Gravity 92.6
Splatting 90.5
75% 91.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27 512GB
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 444 419 449 453 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 405
Write 432
Mixed 391
SusWrite 436
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 38
130% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 204
177% 259 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 96%
Great: 100%
KingFast 64GB
59GB free
Firmware: 20150818
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 160 157 160 160 160 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 0875 JHD3200U1908JG 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.1% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 21.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD35147 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: Medion MD35147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback