Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A7 V14.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V14.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V14.2
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '23 at 18:33
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 38.5
1-Core 157
2-Core 288
81% 161 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 747
78% 625 Pts
64-Core 1,253
78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1D05 1179) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3887
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 14.5
10% 37.4 fps
MRender 18.8
Gravity 25
Splatting 16
16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7002Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1443 1766 1735 1848 1510 500 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,049
Write 1,661
Mixed 1,549
SusWrite 1,467
377% 1,682 MB/s
4K Read 72.4
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 96.2
326% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,335
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 1,109
843% 1,142 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 324%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 7.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V14.2 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Monster ABRA A7 V14.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback