Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF H370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 18:08
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 79%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 235
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 576
67% 521 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 177
Parallax 164
149% 174 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
117% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSM28256GPTCB3B-S112612 256GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 410
Write 221
Mixed 339
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 31.1
119% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 23.5
66% 145 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 80%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
26GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 193
Write 98.1
Mixed 75.1
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.9
212% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX Adata DDR4 3600 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 22.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 20.8
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 89.8
45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback