MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 16:10
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 693
71% 576 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.2.2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.5% Average
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 73.2
42% 61.5 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 44
43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,495
Write 2,229
Mixed 1,770
481% 2,165 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 66
214% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 417
DQ Mixed 598
436% 573 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
73GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,514
Write 4,839
Mixed 6,185
1,440% 6,512 MB/s
4K Read 353
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 205
889% 244 MB/s
DQ Read 991
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 667
519% 725 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
284GB free
Firmware: S5Z42109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1038 1056 1056 1056 1046 1045 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,309
Write 1,070
Mixed 972
SusWrite 1,049
247% 1,100 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 63.5
207% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 571
DQ Mixed 341
340% 550 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 210%
Great: 277%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
402GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 188 218 202 189 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 442
Write 392
Mixed 231
SusWrite 202
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 7.8
61% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 51.9
DQ Mixed 25.7
35% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 58%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
382GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 74 74 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 77.2
Write 76.1
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 73.2
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 61%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 1TB
572GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 94 95 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 90.5
Write 62.1
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 92.9
98% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 43%
TrekStor DS pocket light 1TB
570GB free, PID 003a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 35
Write 37.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 37.3
48% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 35.2
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 39.5
SC Mixed 32.1
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $473
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback