Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '23 at 01:28
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 174
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 317
36% 281 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 16 7.6 8.9 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 100
Write 4.2
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 13.4
23% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $208
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback