Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180905
Uptime32.1 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 19:44
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 230
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 651
69% 551 Pts
64-Core 878
54% 878 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Dell(1028 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.5% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 72
Parallax 65.7
57% 69.2 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 66.1
56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 17 75 80 66 43 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 299
Write 203
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 61.4
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 0.6
22% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 35.1
46% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
282GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 148 147 146 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 177
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 147
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD Adata 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 30.8
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 25.4
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback