Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A315-23

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-23  (all builds)
MotherboardDL Lotus_DA
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 00:16
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Memory 27.6
1-Core 46.7
2-Core 77.2
28% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 81.1
8-Core 89
11% 85.1 Pts
64-Core 96.1
6% 96.1 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1456) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.30.11
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2
1% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 4.1
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00BTW 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 324 372 367 455 507 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
62% Good
Read 351
Write 278
Mixed 286
SusWrite 395
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 18.9
60% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 81.7
DQ Mixed 95.2
75% 105 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 62%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-119.A00G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.4% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.1
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 269
15% 269 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-23 Builds (Compare 672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-23

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $217Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback