Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1758

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GP70 2OD
MotherboardMSI MS-1758  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 19:46
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 148
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 427
45% 360 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
MSI(1462 10E9) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 9.3
6% 7.5 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 9.1
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU720 500GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Y200225a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 423 430 440 443 432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 443
Mixed 400
SusWrite 431
97% 428 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 32.5
117% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 306
221% 285 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1KBG/4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.9
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1758 Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1758

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback