Today's hottest deals

Clevo W76x/M77xCUH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemClevo W76x/M77xCUH  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W76x/M77xCUH
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100429
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 07:01
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 840-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 91.6
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 95.8
55% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 199
22% 174 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500
Clevo(1558 0770) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AOTEN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 91 33 31 30 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.3% Poor
Read 233
Write 186
Mixed 102
SusWrite 62.6
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 5.9
40% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 43.7
DQ Mixed 15.1
29% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 81%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
153GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 34 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 37.4
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 34.9
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3S1333M/4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
37.1% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W76x/M77xCUH Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo W76x/M77xCUH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback