bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
System
MotherboardTYAN S8253GM4NE-2T-7252
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 15:56
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7252 8-Core
P0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 183
63% 113 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 772
66% 568 Pts
64-Core 2,176
135% 2,176 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W5100
HP(103C 230C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 930 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.Q2.1
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 24.3
14% 21.8 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 21.5
17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2086 2101 2106 2125 2123 2104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,089
Write 2,006
Mixed 1,492
SusWrite 2,107
433% 1,923 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 34.9
144% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 527
DQ Mixed 591
453% 620 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 284%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
146% Outstanding
MC Read 56.8
MC Write 62.6
MC Mixed 57.9
169% 59.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 30.4
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 146%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback