Today's hottest deals

Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock EP2C602-4L/D16  (all builds)
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 06:19
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 65.3
1-Core 90
2-Core 176
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 628
56% 473 Pts
64-Core 2,417
150% 2,417 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 106
57% 80.5 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 80.3
Splatting 49.6
52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 573 277 277 276 276 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,149
Write 968
Mixed 787
SusWrite 325
180% 807 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 61.7
203% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 473
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 407
307% 414 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 148%
Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
79GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 285 257 246 226 211 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 417
Mixed 373
SusWrite 268
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 48.4
162% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 339
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 124%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 160 164 163 160 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 151
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 163
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
277% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
66GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 60 60 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 74.9
Write 77.7
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 60.4
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
194GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 94 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 137
Write 137
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 93.6
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
91GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 76
Write 68.1
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 84.4
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C11 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.3% Average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.2
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EP2C602-4L/D16 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback