Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemHP
MotherboardHP 84DE
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 09:11
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 137
50% 86 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 214
27% 207 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 84DE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 5.4
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 7.4
5% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GVL256 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220719b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 517 716 910 520 444 360 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 862
Write 865
Mixed 677
SusWrite 578
168% 745 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 39.4
132% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 260
218% 320 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 126%
Great: 269%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 178 179 176 181 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 162
Mixed 101
SusWrite 173
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 12GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.8% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 11.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback