Today's hottest deals

Asus WS X299 PRO_SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 188%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics169% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive1,106% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus WS X299 PRO_SE  (all builds)
Memory128.4 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 09:14
Run Duration456 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10980XE-$1,100
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 75.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 239
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 985
88% 744 Pts
64-Core 2,878
178% 2,878 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 6000
Nvidia(10DE 12BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
169% Outstanding
Lighting 232
Reflection 222
Parallax 251
189% 235 fps
MRender 238
Gravity 243
Splatting 197
182% 226 fps
Poor: 136%
This bench: 169%
Great: 173%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Uncertaintruth LX800 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.S.F.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4345 2901 2892 2895 2888 2902 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1,106% Outstanding
Read 4,246
Write 8,189
Mixed 4,697
SusWrite 3,137
1,149% 5,067 MB/s
4K Read 733
4K Write 553
4K Mixed 618
2,196% 635 MB/s
DQ Read 1,808
DQ Write 1,210
DQ Mixed 1,464
1,104% 1,494 MB/s
Qnap QDA-A2MAR RAID0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3324 413 415 420 480 465 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1,014% Outstanding
Read 4,354
Write 8,405
Mixed 4,811
SusWrite 919
1,045% 4,622 MB/s
4K Read 768
4K Write 580
4K Mixed 650
2,305% 666 MB/s
DQ Read 1,912
DQ Write 1,302
DQ Mixed 1,570
1,182% 1,595 MB/s
OWC SoftRAID 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1411 3483 1487 1489 1490 1487 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1,090% Outstanding
Read 4,424
Write 8,636
Mixed 4,798
SusWrite 1,808
1,113% 4,916 MB/s
4K Read 787
4K Write 588
4K Mixed 666
2,357% 680 MB/s
DQ Read 1,979
DQ Write 1,377
DQ Mixed 1,635
1,233% 1,664 MB/s
OWC SoftRAID 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6615 5929 5968 5964 6002 6018 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1,353% Outstanding
Read 4,360
Write 8,654
Mixed 4,834
SusWrite 6,083
1,361% 5,983 MB/s
4K Read 794
4K Write 594
4K Mixed 666
2,371% 684 MB/s
DQ Read 2,012
DQ Write 1,379
DQ Mixed 1,654
1,246% 1,682 MB/s
Poor: 391%
This bench: 1,353%
Great: 897%
OWC SoftRAID 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4333 2379 2379 2371 2374 2369 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1,138% Outstanding
Read 4,303
Write 8,543
Mixed 4,767
SusWrite 2,701
1,151% 5,078 MB/s
4K Read 787
4K Write 593
4K Mixed 660
2,352% 680 MB/s
DQ Read 2,019
DQ Write 1,384
DQ Mixed 1,667
1,254% 1,690 MB/s
Hs-ssd-c2000pro 2048G 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: HBAF28FT
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,373
Write 8,282
Mixed 4,852
1,318% 5,836 MB/s
4K Read 793
4K Write 593
4K Mixed 668
2,372% 685 MB/s
DQ Read 1,970
DQ Write 1,424
DQ Mixed 1,710
1,274% 1,701 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 379%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 CM4X32GC3600C18K2D CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 CM4X32GC3600C18K2D CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 255GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
124% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 63.8
MC Mixed 46.6
145% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 10.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 112%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS X299 PRO_SE Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 186%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 PRO_SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback