Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '23 at 18:18
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 115
53% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 241
28% 216 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.3% Excellent
Lighting 84.7
Reflection 88.3
Parallax 160
69% 111 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 88
Splatting 152
117% 143 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 93%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$195
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 294 306 323 357 358 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 371
Write 339
Mixed 307
SusWrite 314
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 33.5
108% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 41.2
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 47.9
40% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1600C9D3/8GX 32GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 15
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 12
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback