bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8.57GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.57GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory3.7 GB free of 8.57422 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '23 at 17:12
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Bronze 3106
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
Memory 37.7
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 92.6
33% 58.2 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 304
30% 244 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.3.5
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 49.7
13% 30.3 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 44.4
Splatting 42.9
34% 41.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 27GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 534
Write 450
Mixed 477
109% 487 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 17.9
58% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.1
DQ Write 50
DQ Mixed 83.4
47% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-512MB Virtual RAM VMW-64MB Virtual RAM VMW-8MB Virtual RAM VMW-4MB 8GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
8192, 512, 64, 8, 4 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback