Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '23 at 10:03
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Six-Core
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 212
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 311
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1B0A 90F6) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 473.70
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 9.2
6% 8.53 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.8
6% 8.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 333 340 358 359 350 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 366
Write 295
Mixed 240
SusWrite 320
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 11.2
57% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 19.7
34% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback