AZW Green G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemAZW Green G2  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW Green G2
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220311
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '23 at 17:23
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 145
50% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 209
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 4
Parallax 3
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0803A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 292 322 314 218 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 289
Write 331
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 246
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 3.4
53% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 31.9
62% 122 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 211%
TrekStor DS pocket light 1TB
137GB free, PID 003a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 32 34 35 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 29.6
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 32.9
36% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
23% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.C8FP 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.3% Above average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.3
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 15.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Green G2 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: AZW Green G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback