Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH317-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Alphard_CFS
Memory16.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateJan 23 '23 at 19:48
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 108
2-Core 179
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 521
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1342) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2737
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.6% Good
Lighting 86
Reflection 90.8
Parallax 80.1
70% 85.6 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 71.9
66% 81.8 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN720 SED 1TB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10103100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1285 565 564 550 574 553 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,168
Write 1,842
Mixed 1,448
SusWrite 682
291% 1285 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 40.9
137% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 533
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 466
350% 470 MB/s
Poor: 171%
This bench: 152%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 14.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH317-53 Builds (Compare 1,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback