Today's hottest deals

Corsair VENGEANCE i7200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics186% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemCorsair VENGEANCE i7200  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star Z490-A PRO (MS-7C75)
Memory14.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210728
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 14:26
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 290
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 1,074
96% 811 Pts
64-Core 1,862
115% 1,862 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$730
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
186% Outstanding
Lighting 270
Reflection 237
Parallax 297
220% 268 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 228
Splatting 166
183% 233 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 186%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP400 1TB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 647 120 132 106 56 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 105
Write 1,641
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 185
113% 488 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 15.6
75% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 696
470% 577 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 308%
Adata XPG SX8000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$100
52GB free
Firmware: C2.2.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 594 227 229 229 294 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 978
Write 686
Mixed 802
SusWrite 334
156% 700 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 52.3
186% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 725
DQ Mixed 422
356% 505 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 141%
Great: 181%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 198 193 183 180 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 127
Write 158
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 183
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
130% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 212 216 214 212 213 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
SABRENT DISK00 240GB
24GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 306
Write 393
Mixed 271
SusWrite 0.3
318% 243 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 18.2
1,542% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 38.1
DQ Mixed 21.5
2,089% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 126%
Great: 182%
SABRENT DISK01 120GB
48GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 107 64 58 33 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 344
Write 360
Mixed 312
SusWrite 78.8
359% 274 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 18.5
1,560% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 37.6
DQ Mixed 6.9
1,577% 20.5 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 150%
Great: 151%
SABRENT DISK03 120GB
48GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 109 65 57 34 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 267
Write 177
Mixed 210
SusWrite 79
231% 183 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 16.9
1,449% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 30.5
DQ Mixed 18.8
1,740% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 133%
Great: 149%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMWS8GL3200K16W4E 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 28.4
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 28.4
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VENGEANCE i7200 Builds (Compare 357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

System: Corsair VENGEANCE i7200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback