Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H97-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory14.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 00:53
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 95.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 216
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 522
55% 442 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 81.2%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$222
EVGA(3842 1068)
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 4083 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Lighting 92.3
Reflection 95.6
Parallax 87.4
75% 91.8 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 84
Splatting 77.1
76% 95.8 fps
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 75.5%
 Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 128 137 136 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 380
Write 183
Mixed 251
SusWrite 134
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 51.9
193% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 190
152% 214 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 92.8%
 Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$23
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 182 184 185 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 189
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 184
122% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.3
256% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 109%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50
81GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 57.1
Write 38.7
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 41.9
32% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 28.5%
 Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 9905403-400.A00LF 9905403-400.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 20.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 61.4%
 Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B71 27GL650F
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H97-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-Gaming 3 - $132

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel  $65Bench 71%, 255,027 samples223x
Core i7-4790KIntel  $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples127x
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples102x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples102x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples68x
GTX 960Nvidia  $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples51x
SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples49x
A400 240GBKingston  $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples35x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $44Bench 103%, 951,591 samples12x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples46x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples41x
KHX1866C10D3/8G 9905403-400.A00LF 9905403-400.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 51%, 42 samples24x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback