BOXX APEXX 4 7404

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBOXX APEXX 4 7404  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X99-E WS/USB 3.1
Memory122.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '23 at 12:02
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 206
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 830
74% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,368
85% 1,368 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
MSI(1462 3609) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 186
Parallax 172
128% 172 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 174
Splatting 122
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1443 1451 1439 1431 1430 1429 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,108
Write 1,452
Mixed 860
SusWrite 1,437
326% 1,464 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 49.7
164% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 859
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 727
527% 693 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 253%
Great: 353%
Seagate SkyHawk 10TB (2016)-$229
2.5TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 163 165 164 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 56.5
MC Write 55.3
MC Mixed 47.6
152% 53.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 20.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 132%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical APEXX 4 7404 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: BOXX APEXX 4 7404

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback