Asus H110M-E/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus H110M-E/M.2  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 19:24
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 231
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 567
59% 473 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Sapphire(174B 5454) 2GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1897 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 36
29% 36.3 fps
MRender 41.2
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 25.5
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 281 289 299 301 304 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 429
Mixed 430
SusWrite 301
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 47.9
158% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 349
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
273GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 39 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 55.3
Write 32.5
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 40.1
52% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
69% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 76.C102G.D170B 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 22.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 23.4
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback