Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV GENE  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140515
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 17:18
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 184
76% 127 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 621
59% 488 Pts
64-Core 764
47% 764 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 66.9
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 90.8
54% 73.2 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 45.9
49% 62.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 195 191 191 193 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 448
Write 234
Mixed 240
SusWrite 194
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 24.5
111% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 213
170% 240 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR Kingston 9905402-670.A00LF Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX Kingston 9905471-015.A00LF 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 20.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV GENE Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV GENE - $594

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $790
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback