Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

16 months ago, 16 months ago.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10210U 54,859 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 77.3 1-Core 107 2-Core 186 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 466 52% 409 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1E50 800B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	5.38% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 7.1 5% 5.77 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 9.8 6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.38% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MS201-512G 512GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: U1029A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 385 366 360 363 365 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.5% Very good	Read 444 Write 369 Mixed 342 SusWrite 359 85% 379 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 23.2 98% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 41.7 79% 151 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x16GB 15,722 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.2% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 10.4 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 85.8 47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	5x
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	1x
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16