Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics5.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '23 at 02:43
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 197
2-Core 389
116% 222 Pts
4-Core 764
8-Core 1,494
134% 1,129 Pts
64-Core 2,229
138% 2,229 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 112%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 881A) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 8.6
6% 7.6 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 7
Splatting 6.7
6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1A3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 457
Write 454
Mixed 384
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 34.7
135% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 177
163% 247 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 80
Mixed 62.2
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 59%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
11GB free, PID a83a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 148
Write 20.2
Mixed 29.7
59% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.7
150% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 4000 C20 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 32.2
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 28.8
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 2,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback