| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock AB350M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181220 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 07 '23 at 13:27 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 30% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.1%
Good
|
65% 113 Pts
|
48% 397 Pts
|
32% 522 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 Graphics
MSI(1462 341E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.50.20.01
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.8%
Average
|
49% 64.3 fps
|
43% 53.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 167 162 158 154 153 MB/s
|
86.3%
Excellent
|
79% 352 MB/s
|
136% 46.4 MB/s
|
255% 350 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown=> F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.3%
Below average
|
37% 12.9 GB/s
|
37% 12.9 GB/s
|
40% 99.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,454 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $100
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 299x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $120Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 130x |
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $125Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 105x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 151x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 125x |
| RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 100x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $468 |