Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-VD (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VD (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 21:43
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$127
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 724
70% 578 Pts
64-Core 931
58% 931 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 74.1
Parallax 67.3
58% 70.7 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 67.3
56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 424
Mixed 8
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.1
47% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
264GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 76 74 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 117
Write 112
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 74.7
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 28.4
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 24
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VD (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback