QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory15.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.5 GB free of 15.625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 12:01
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 56.2
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 208
62% 118 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 627
59% 491 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 147
Parallax 282
153% 205 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 202
Splatting 148
160% 203 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 144%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
858GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 117 120 116 81 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 311
Write 72.2
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 99.4
31% 142 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 9.3
31% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 86.8
67% 91.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 57%
Qemu HARDDISK 97GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 67 84 120 99 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 36% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 16.1
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15.4
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback