Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT (TPM DP)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2 MT (TPM DP)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '23 at 14:24
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 49.9
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 151
53% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 312
42% 311 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 198E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.8
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 418 421 415 455 454 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 438
Mixed 338
SusWrite 425
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 49.1
161% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 325
255% 351 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
SAMSUNG HM160HI 160GB
149GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 61.5
Write 24.2
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 37
48% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
51% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G2 MT (TPM DP) Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT (TPM DP)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback