Asrock B550M Steel Legend

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B550M Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '23 at 12:16
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$172
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 88.5
1-Core 175
2-Core 344
108% 203 Pts
4-Core 639
8-Core 1,038
103% 839 Pts
64-Core 1,572
97% 1,572 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxsun 256GB NM6-2280 256GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111H0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 517 338 111 111 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,413
Write 919
Mixed 831
SusWrite 241
189% 851 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 26.1
197% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 632
DQ Mixed 314
293% 445 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 150%
Great: 198%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
96GB free
Firmware: SBFK66.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 445 236 220 107 274 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 295
Write 108
Mixed 203
SusWrite 286
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 43.2
154% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 213
179% 256 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
214GB free
Firmware: SBFK66.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 441 445 107 157 362 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 184
Write 104
Mixed 147
SusWrite 324
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 39.5
135% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 211
166% 224 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 102%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$38
27GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,396
Write 1,021
Mixed 1,041
256% 1,153 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 83.3
280% 97.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,000
DQ Write 1,016
DQ Mixed 1,106
804% 1,041 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
336GB free
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 441 446 447 447 282 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 504
Write 458
Mixed 410
SusWrite 418
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 19.8
108% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 28.3
82% 168 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 35.1
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 30.1
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 36.9
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550M Steel Legend Builds (Compare 2,379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B550M Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $533
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback