Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 80 1-Core 98 2-Core 195 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 457 48% 386 Pts	64-Core 489 30% 489 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7350 1,650 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 2186) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.07% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.7 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.07% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 118 84 66 63 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 480 Write 388 Mixed 392 SusWrite 110 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 36 118% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 234 182% 256 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 124%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 492GB free Firmware: 00.0NA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 95 95 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 81.7 Mixed 65 SusWrite 95 62% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.5% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.1 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 18.4 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 16GBMicronBench 52%, 3 samples	1x
CT102464BA160B.C16 Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 12GBUnknownBench 29%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $356