Lenovo 3228CA5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 3228CA5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 23:36
Run Duration503 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 98
2-Core 196
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 462
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7350
MSI(1462 2186) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.8 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 369 149 92 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 446
Write 446
Mixed 392
SusWrite 116
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 36
118% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 231
176% 243 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 124%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
492GB free
Firmware: 00.0NA01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 94 94 95 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 87.3
Write 91.9
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 63.2
55% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.5% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3228CA5 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 3228CA5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $356
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback