Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 07:44
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$126
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 651
69% 554 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.5% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 134
Parallax 120
97% 124 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 120
Splatting 112
90% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 175 92 26 13 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 468
Write 348
Mixed 373
SusWrite 138
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 23.6
106% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 45
94% 187 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 102%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
115GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 423 434 445 440 441 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 422
Mixed 354
SusWrite 433
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 41
141% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 257
219% 321 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
Samsung 840 EVO 120GB
212GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 438 450 483 482 481 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 420
Write 75.7
Mixed 182
SusWrite 460
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 42.4
135% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon-Power SP008GBLFU240B02 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 22.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $143
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback