QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory15.9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.7 GB free of 15.8652 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '22 at 11:30
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 53.5
1-Core 98
2-Core 183
61% 112 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 696
63% 530 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,035
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 90
Parallax 198
138% 152 fps
MRender 240
Gravity 189
Splatting 126
145% 185 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 132%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
865GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 74 100 69 74 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.8% Poor
Read 257
Write 75.6
Mixed 102
SusWrite 78.3
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 9.1
28% 8.83 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 71
DQ Mixed 88.2
66% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 57%
Qemu HARDDISK 97GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 95 101 107 97 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 36% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.5% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 17.3
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback