Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateDec 21 '22 at 13:34
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 197
78% 132 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 302
46% 336 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Zotac(19DA 1281) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 30.1
17% 25.4 fps
MRender 31.8
Gravity 28
Splatting 25.3
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 58 64 56 61 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 306
Write 83.4
Mixed 124
SusWrite 62.4
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 24.6
92% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 74.7
DQ Mixed 85.2
93% 164 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 193 200 209 208 210 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 114
Write 145
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 197
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
99% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
73GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 106 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 95
Write 96.4
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 106
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 69%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
100GB free
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 47 49 48 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 43.3
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 48
33% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 35%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3,149
Mixed 2.5
1,038% 1,576 MB/s
4K Read 73.9
4K Mixed 0
411% 37 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL11 Series 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,694 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback