MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 00:24
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 167
2-Core 333
103% 194 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 1,115
106% 875 Pts
64-Core 1,499
93% 1,499 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 883C) ≥ 4GB; DUAL-RTX3060TI-O8G-V2
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 178
Parallax 166
151% 177 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 139
Splatting 119
118% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,969
Write 2,040
Mixed 1,669
423% 1,893 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 60.1
207% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,110
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 935
704% 948 MB/s
Poor: 184% Great: 288%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
70GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,357
Write 1,502
Mixed 1,582
401% 1,814 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 74.6
241% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,147
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 987
746% 1,006 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
272GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 135 137 134 136 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 116
Write 99.4
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 135
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
321GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 173 172 171 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 123
Write 133
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 171
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 113%
USB3.0 high speed 960GB
404GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 197 199 129 6.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 252
Write 194
Mixed 212
SusWrite 154
266% 203 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 20.4
2,308% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 56
DQ Mixed 22.5
2,752% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 214%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 36.6
112% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.5
SC Write 47.9
SC Mixed 33.9
107% 37.4 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $888
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback