Lenovo 21BCS0F800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 21BCS0F800  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21BCS0F800
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '22 at 02:19
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 57.1
1-Core 159
2-Core 281
87% 166 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 578
62% 491 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 50A2) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.40.52
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 12.2
12% 12.3 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 14.6
11% 13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-4D512-Q79 512GB
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3U279
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,391
Write 1646
Mixed 1461
405% 1,833 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 36.4
161% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 928
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 675
496% 664 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 258%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
29GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 155
Write 35.2
Mixed 44.5
77% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 4
288% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.7% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 21BCS0F800 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 21BCS0F800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $384WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback