Today's hottest deals

Panasonic CF-C2CGEBBML

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemPanasonic CF-C2CGEBBML  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFC2-2
Memory3.9 GB free of 8.01562 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140821
Uptime9 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 11:07
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Memory 33.9
1-Core 26.3
2-Core 54.1
23% 38.1 Pts
4-Core 91.5
8-Core 103
13% 97.3 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ128GCSY 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYPA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 203 158 220 156 131 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.2% Below average
Read 243
Write 250
Mixed 153
SusWrite 169
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 11.4
34% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 144
108% 146 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 56GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 233
17% 233 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-C2CGEBBML Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-C2CGEBBML

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback