Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 75 1-Core 111 2-Core 212 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 422 53% 401 Pts	64-Core 537 33% 537 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 342GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 679 824 832 826 750 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	176% Outstanding	Read 1516 Write 1,512 Mixed 1,345 SusWrite 741 287% 1,278 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 41.5 126% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 820 DQ Write 542 DQ Mixed 687 511% 683 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 176% Great: 297%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 7GB free Firmware: UE450000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 375 Write 134 Mixed 260 56% 256 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 15.7 61% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 77 DQ Mixed 10.7 31% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 114GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 81 80 81 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 52.2 Write 61.9 Mixed 43.1 SusWrite 78.8 43% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown VMA42UG-MIC1U2AW1 2x8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	60.2% Good	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 20.9 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 90.3 44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	73x
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	38x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	37x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $71Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	109x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	64x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $31Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	59x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $452