Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCisco UCSC-C220-M3S  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco UCSC-C220-M3S
Memory123.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 22:39
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 113
50% 81.6 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 474
42% 358 Pts
64-Core 1,498
93% 1,498 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 119GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 114 104 95 87 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.4% Average
Read 246
Write 138
Mixed 163
SusWrite 102
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 19.1
71% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 110
92% 133 MB/s
LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 999GB
911GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 107 106 108 108 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.7% Good
Read 114
Write 56.5
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 108
65% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 0xAD00 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 0xAD00 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 0xAD00 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 0xAD00 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 0xAD00 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 0xAD00 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 0xAD00 HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 0xAD00 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 0xAD00 HMT31GR7AFR4C-H... 128GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.6% Very good
MC Read 37
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 29.4
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.3
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback